Actually, that is the difference between you and... a few thousand 'average' instructors who teach under the various agencies- PADI being the largest.
I think your argument is not NAUI vs PADI, but you vs PADI. Good luck with that.
You're entitled to believe what you choose. Perhaps if you actually did look into it, you would find that each certification Agency has its own philosophy. As a PADI Instructor recently posted the NAUI Credo, I suppose I can use some excerpts to highlight some of the differences in philosophy:
Quote
- "An individual should not be qualified as a NAUI Instructor unless those empowered to qualify the person would allow that person to teach their loved ones to dive."
- "The leadership power in NAUI should be limited to and controlled by the democratic process."
-"NAUI Instructors are qualified professional educators who are granted academic freedom to teach diving in any reasonable manner as long as NAUI standards and policies are met. NAUI does not have a rigid approach to teaching diving."
- "NAUI Instructors may exceed NAUI standards in ways that do not jeopardize student safety."
- "Those who wish to learn to dive must have good water skills, attain the ability to swim and demonstrate basic water survival skills."
- "Divers should not be totally dependent on their equipment for safety."
- "Anyone certified as a diver should be able to perform the basics of a rescue of a Buddy diver."
- "It is more important to teach a few students well that to certify many marginally trained divers.We further believe that educational quality must never be sacrificed for economic reasons."
It goes on, but you should be able to quickly see the differences. I'm not saying that NAUI is the best choice for everyone; that's a decision that we each have to make. You can paint, or you can paint-by-numbers. Each may result in a nice painting. It's an individual choice how you want to go about it...