I have nothing against people solo-diving if they have the skills, equipment and protocols that support doing so. I am shocked that people are supportive of your doing so without having assessed your skill level. Your title of your post is "not certified for it." Your status shows less than 50 dives. You're asking advice not of a mentor, but on a basic forum on the internet.
I can appreciate the appeal of solo diving. I am a solo hiker, and I have managed a number of 7-10 day solo hikes and thoroughly enjoyed my own company and my own pace. I also built up to it, and had contingencies in place in case I got disoriented, sick, had a major equipment failure, or injured. You don't seem to have done this, even though you're going underwater -- a much more dangerous environment than the Rockies were for me. With respect, solo diving is probably pretty safe if you're well-trained and properly equipped, and your dive plan is sensible. At least, it's safe until it isn't...the second something goes wrong is not the time to find out you haven't properly prepared.
I think a lot of new divers also find the idea of solo diving appealing because it means not having to keep an eye on a buddy. Give some thought as to whether this is a skill deficit rather than a desire to actually be solo.
There are no scuba police. You will get responses from some people saying no one should ever solo dive. You will get responses (and already have) from people saying "go for it" without ever even asking about your ability to do so safely. Someone will also probably post and ask if they can have your gear if you die. Personally, I think you're planning to dive beyond your training. Whether that comes as a solo dive, an overhead dive or a deco dive, my belief is that diving beyond your training is a set up to have an accident. Have a read through the accidents and incidents thread...and give some serious thought to how many of those unfortunate people became unfortunate by deciding to dive beyond their training.
All the best.