miketsp
Contributor
Although I've been diving EAN now for over 10 years, over the last 24 months in order to analyse tanks I've hooked up my reg set (with my analyser attached to BC hose) to quite a few tanks partially filled with 100% O2. The tanks had been partially filled with O2 but the compressor operator had then failed to top off with air. I'm seeing this mistake becoming very common at various operators and various sites - probably due to EAN becoming more widely available.
I assume that there have not been any serious consequences because the tank pressure would normally be low - even for a target mix of 40% the undiluted initial O2 would only correspond to the tank at about 1/4 pressure.
But it does raise a couple of questions:
Is there any risk of putting 100% O2 at 50 bar into a non-O2 prepared/clean reg set?
By repeatedly doing this is there any risk of causing premature failure of o-rings or other parts during a dive?
Does it justify only using the type of analyser that you hold directly against the cylinder valve - eliminating the need to hook the regs up to an unknown cylinder - although personally I've always found found this type of analyser a pain to use, slower to stabilize and less accurate?
I assume that there have not been any serious consequences because the tank pressure would normally be low - even for a target mix of 40% the undiluted initial O2 would only correspond to the tank at about 1/4 pressure.
But it does raise a couple of questions:
Is there any risk of putting 100% O2 at 50 bar into a non-O2 prepared/clean reg set?
By repeatedly doing this is there any risk of causing premature failure of o-rings or other parts during a dive?
Does it justify only using the type of analyser that you hold directly against the cylinder valve - eliminating the need to hook the regs up to an unknown cylinder - although personally I've always found found this type of analyser a pain to use, slower to stabilize and less accurate?