Please don't take that as a criticism of you as you didn't create this mediocre system. It is a criticism of every instructor that perpetuates it (like those who liked/bullseyed your response).Well how can it? As someone with a moderate amount of experience in (non-diving) training design and delivery, I’d only really class myself as competent at a skill when I can comfortably apply it outside of the training environment. As written elsewhere, specialty courses teach and validate skills, but ‘competence’ in them only comes through experience and using them. Eg on my dry suit course my three training dives taught me how to use a dry suit, but it was my subsequent four dry suit recreational dives where I became ‘competent’ in a range of conditions. Similarly my wreck diving specialty course with four dives taught and validated a set of skills but it’ll only really be doing it for real next month on a limited penetration dive on Zenobia that I’ll become ‘competent’. I don’t have a problem with that. I think it’s sensible.
It unfortunately is a minority of instructors who ensure students reach a level of competency/proficiency. That doesn't mean they won't continue to improve (as we all should strive to continue to improve) but rather they don't need additional correction to be competent.
The definition of mastery is sometimes interpreted as "student didn't drown while performing skill that looked like interpretive dance." Far too often instructors check off boxes.
Again, @Leatherboot69 , I'm not criticizing you, but rather instructors who should do us all a favor and stop teaching like the people who liked/bullseyed your comment.
For you, I'd only suggest taking fundies to see the difference quality makes. Don't take my word for it, see for yourself. Please remember, it is a recreational skills course.
And good luck.