That was a well-written article. The part that stood out the most for me was the description of the existing signs:
I've read a lot of well-meaning posts from people in the last few weeks about how personal responsibility and common sense must rule the day, and how people who don't heed the current signs somehow deserve whatever fate will befall them for ignoring the signs. The above quote demonstrates a very good point though: the existing signs are meek and ineffective. It can be easy to forget this if you've been aware of Monastery for years, and are personally aware of its history, danger and consequences; it seems obvious that the beach is dangerous and should be given respect. But especially for tourists and first-time visitors, which Monterey/Carmel get a lot of, a sign that's bigger, more foreboding, and hits with more impact (including the idea to incorporate a memorial) could make a real difference. And if it doesn't, it certainly can't be worse than what's currently there.There are signs that warn: "Surf subject to unexpected life-threatening waves & currents." They warn: "Climbing on rocks, swimming and wading unsafe." But the signs erected by the State Parks Department look like standard warning signs at so many other beaches. They have an obligatory feel. They whisper when they should shout.