I thought I had given the examples. But, let me try to rephrase it, ...)
I read your response as carefully as I could, trying my best to understand your points. I think we have a problem in that English is not your first language, so perhaps you are not phrasing your responses to best advantage.
I have finally decided that, to put it as politely as I can, you are drawing conclusions based upon an incomplete understanding of the theory behind ascent rates and decompression. To put it bluntly, I don't think you understood what you wrote about in your response. It really doesn't make sense to me. You are presenting opinions here that I have never seen presented anywhere, and I have done a lot of reading on this subject.
As you said at the end of your post, you are still pretty early in your education in these matters.
Some of the people who have been disagreeing with you have a lot of experience and have done a lot of studying of decompression theory.They have gone well beyond the baby steps you say you are taking. With that in mind, I have to have a great deal of admiration for your self confidence. If I were early in my understanding of a complex theory, and if people who really knew a lot about it were telling me I was completely wrong about what I understood, I would not have the courage to tell them that they were wrong and I was right. You obviously have more confidence in yourself than I would have ever had at that stage in my learning.I guess I am many years away from decompression dive, one step after the other and let's make them baby ones. =)
On the other hand, if you ever want to progress beyond baby steps, it might be wise to listen to people who have gone beyond those steps rather than lecture them about why they are wrong about everything.