drrich2
Contributor
I prefer to aim for a popularity contest where the 'voters' are well-informed, hence posting here. I've not been impressed with publication lists of 'The Top # <insert dive type> Destinations.'The problem is, this is just a popularity contest....with a bias toward the places that lots of people go. For example, Bonaire comes out as the #2 spot in the Caribbean and Atlantic region for "advanced diving." Really?
That's been an evolution. Quite some years ago, probably spending more time looking at dive magazines and plenty on ScubaBoard, it seemed like Papua New Guinea was really getting talked up. Then Palau was, and I thought 'Maybe someday.' Then the spotlight moved to Raja Amat and Komodo. I hadn't learned the geography and was too early in my diving to understand the differences.So, for your Coral Triangle trip, why not Palau?
Palau continued to get high marks, but not up there with Raja Ampat or PNG. Not unlike the Maldives, it was well-regarded but didn't seem quite as esteemed. I learned Palau is known for lots of sharks and diving with reef hooks - securing yourself to a rock (I assume) and hanging in the current like a human kite, watching things go by. I would think there's a lot more to it, but that's the impression I got from reports.
If I expected to hit the region several times, it'd be on my to do list, but not 1st or 2nd place.
The impression I've gotten so far is, for a first trip for someone like me (but who'll do more trips than I ever will), hit Raja Ampat or maybe Komodo. For a 2nd trip, hit the other one. After that, to save money and cut those grueling travel times, start on the Philippines (likely with Puerto Galera).
But everyone's situation is different. I like these discussions; they help people know their options. A skilled photographer and macro lover might crave Lembeh Strait.