lamont
Contributor
are you all saying that the PST looks better because it is shinier?
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
I don't know about the boats in Bill's area, but around here the ones with compressors on board are kind of scary. Filtration is minimal and dessication is a real problem, it's a nice service but I try not to take advantage of it. Hard to do on live-aboards, though.Doc Intrepid:but I'm having difficulty with this statement. If any steel tank is kept pressurized to some degree with dry gas, and is refilled with whips that have no water (salt or fresh) droplets on the whips, internal rusting should not occur. If identical levels of moisture or water vapor are somehow introduced into two steel tanks, PST and Worthington, they should suffer roughly the same level of rusting over time. TTBOMK, the steel used for the tanks is basically the same.
OTOH, I've O2 cleaned steel tanks and they're all highly susceptible to flash rusting unless a rust inhibiter is used carefully during the cleaning process. I flash rusted one of my PST 130s and had to retumble it, and we'll see whats going on inside it during the next VIP. I suspect the same outcome would have occurred regardless of whether the tank was a PST or a Worthington.
Is there any data on this statement, or is this essentially an anecdote?
dl348:It is my understanding that both the Faber and Worthington tanks are coated on the inside with iron phosphate which eliminates powder rust. The PST tanks do not have this.