gmbaker
Contributor
PG-dive does not fill Nitrox. Perhaps you should call Paul again
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
oceancurrent:Can anybody explain to me why it is such a pain to get decent Nitrox fills around here? Why are some dive shops frivolously imposing limits (below 40%) on percentage? Perhaps they will impose a 32% limit next! Why do we have the most expensive Nitrox in the world?
That would explain SSD's position, if they weren't preparing to provide fills up to 100% O2. Given that they are, I have to think what Al told you isn't the whole story.oceancurrent:Still, there are a lot of old school boys out there who feel strongly against Nitrox, I guess.
oceancurrent:Quite possibly you are right, Matt. Very likely the story about the AH diver is nothing more than a cover up for a different agenda. Nevertheless, it is quite a poor and ungrounded excuse. It's great that they will be doing 21-100% mixes. However, I can't afford to keep dedicated Nitrox tanks around, so it doesn't do me any good. I think many divers here are in my shoes.
oceancurrent:Just called Atlantic Divers (www.atlanticdivers.com). They have premixed Nitrox up to 36%. The price is $10 for 36% and $15 for <36%. I didn't ask why they have a limit at 36%, but suspect similar believes to ECD. I doubt that there is a technical problem with filling premixed nitrox up to 40% or within 1-2%.
This reminds me that Nitrox certification for recreational divers was introduced by PADI in the 90s after a fiersome debate in their community. Many "experts" foreshadowed that letting recreational divers use Nitrox will result in a lot of accidents - O2 Tox and Bends. Nothing like this happened and, low and behold, Enriched Air Diver became PADI's most popular specialty. Still, there are a lot of old school boys out there who feel strongly against Nitrox, I guess.
RIOceanographer:So you don't have dedicated nitrox tanks, which I take to mean they are not O2 clean, so you can't do partial pressure blending with pure O2 in your tanks....
...Not many people are going to ask for 40% so why on earth would they bank it?...
That may be, or it may be that what's really in the interest of the dive community is standing ground against dive shops that are actually doing someone a disservice.oceancurrent:It's great that they will be doing 21-100% mixes. However, I can't afford to keep dedicated Nitrox tanks around, so it doesn't do me any good. I think many divers here are in my shoes.
And yes, I can live with 36. However, it's a matter of principles to stand ground against diveshops which deviate from the established standards in negative ways. It's in the interest of the dive community to weed out such freevolness before it gets out of control.
Incidentally, I do have an O2 clean tank... just one. It's an aluminium 40 that I use for deco mixes over 40% O2. I have no reason to use anything higher than EAN36 for back gas, and since the shops I frequent don't do partial pressure blending for <EAN40, I only need the one O2 clean tank. Needless to say, I don't need a deco cylinder for shore diving, but not all of my dives are from shore.oceancurrent:1. I was under the impression that many (if not most) folks around don't have O2-clean tanks for very practical reasons. It's silly to use Nitrox for mostly all shore dives, where one can hardly reach 50 fsw.