elan
Contributor
So I've done much reading as to why people prefer steel tanks for doubles. Over and over again I hear people say they prefer the buoyancy characteristics. Without getting into numbers Steel tanks offer the diver the ability to remove weight from oneself to the scuba unit. For a long time I was right there with everyone, I mean this sounds great for those who are doing cold water dives such as myself.
But i can not get over a few simple facts I have yet to see anyone address. The more obvious one is Lift requirement for these heavy tanks. I believe this to be a significant draw back to using steel tanks. A diver should be able to float their scuba unit independent of the diver and with these heavy steels much more lift is required "verses AL of course"
And finally the most important issue i can think of. For someone such as myself diving heavy steels will not require me to dive any other weight, and so this begs the question "what if I need to remove my scuba unit while on a dive!?" without adequate weight on a diver he would become so buoyant that the tanks would do down and the divers feet would go straight up.
It would seem to me that a diver should attempt to get his scuba unit neutral independently as well as himself.
Please post any wisdom or opinions you may have. Thanks for your time
Dive0saur
Well how often do you remove your scuba unit underwater ? for that time I think there will not be a big deal to experience that small discomfort.
The lift is not changing unless you are over weighting yourself.
The big advantage with the HP steals would also be the dry weight of them will be lower. HP100 I believe is only 2 lbs heavier but requires 6lb less lead. That's 8lb for doubles.
Another thing is that weight is spread over the whole tank. This can be an advantage or a disadvantage. You can do the same of cause with the V-weights.