If scuba gear were truly "life support" equipment, there would be a lot of dead divers around. And the sale and servicing of this gear would have so much liability attached to it that it would certainly take a license, issued by a government agency, just like being a medical doctor. A heart/lung machine is "life support." A scuba regulator is a piece of recreational gear.
...
Can you see how a space suit provides "life support" to an astronaut? In space, it is completely hostile to human existence right?? In a sub-marine environment, until we develop viable gills or some other method of O
2/CO
2 exchange, that too is completely hostile to humans. Have a look at the definition given by Oxford dictionary for LIFE SUPPORT:
AskOxford: life support
noun Medicine maintenance of vital functions following disablement or in an adverse environment.
I trust that the concise version is adequate??
try diving without 'life support' equipment. It's called freediving. It can also be a fairly direct route to dying, if you started the dive
with and ended
without the aforementioned equipment.
No we shouldn't have to pay through the nose just because it is 'life-supporting' equipment, but the economists among us (pointing at the guy who writes REALLY
REALLY long posts) have explained the supply and demand paradigm shift already. This label is just another marketing component aimed at creating as much Percieved value possible for the inflated priced product 'they' are selling.
think about it this way: if you think less of your gear, you are willing to pay less for it since in your eyes it just is not worth that much. If, however, the supply side of the equation applies (and the demand side concurrs or accepts) the haughty connotations associated with the label "life support" then BINGO they have created more value in the eyes of the consumer and thus increased the price at which people are willing to purchase.
More Percieved Value issue were brought up:
Shall we say counterfeit then? Although if it's from the same factory it wouldn't be but I am guessing it was more than one or two of them so we can defintiely say illegal
and dishonest
ITS VERY SIMPLE:
Ask Coach or Gucci what one of their $1000 purses costs to manufacture, distribute and market -- Rhetorical question since there is no way anyone will let that gem slip officially. Basically, because as society is willing to pay more, each level of the supply infrastructure is able and willing to take more of a profit margin.
What are we willing to pay for?? That's called Perceived Value. If we see more value (in our own eyes) than the price a vendor is asking for a product, we buy. If not, we keep looking. In the issue above, we as a consumer society are apparently willing to pay a lot for a name.
In the current LDS model it is the Manufacturer (whose good name and reputation we are in buying) is responsible to replace defective merchandise. In their absence, due to anti-competitive policies by the manufacturers (no onlinie sales), we still still get covered, only the vendor budgets to pay for replacement as a cost of doing business. EITHER WAY WE ALL PAY A FRACTION FOR THE DEFECTIVE ITEM ON EVERY GOOD ITEM WE BUY; the only difference is whose margin it comes out of.
Unlike automotive dealership arrangements for warranty work, there is no way for the LDS to get paid for fixing Warranty claims. The only current benefit to a LDS for fixing a warranty claim in house is avoid the cost of shipping, and to have a happy customer now, instead of a disgruntled one waiting for the factory to act. It is possible that the LDS goes as far as to provide a replacement out of their own stock (if available), one attitude/practice which might possibly put them among the LDS who will survive.
It is a sad fact, but globalization is taking over. There are going to be LDS's closing up shop everywhere. Not all LDS are going to go away, but the ones who do not embrace change and continue to sit back and lament "how things were in the old days...". Yeah we unfortunately are going to loose the benefit of their experience. Yes it was how things used to be done, BUT TIMES ARE CHANGING. Paradigm shift is just an pretty, clean, an civilized economics term that means a whole lot of tree shaking is coming up. Lots and Lots. It is quite conceivable that we wont recognize the future LDS. What we can be assured of though is this:
THE LDS WHO SURVIVE WILL BE THE ONES THAT CHANGE IN ORDER TO BEST ADDRESS THE NEEDS OF THEIR CUSTOMERS, NOT THE ONES WHO EXPECT THEIR CUSTOMERS TO ADDRESS THEIR NEEDS.
I missed making an m-quote on the post about the guy who services and compresses. 8$ fills and service for regs no matter where/who sold them. No BellyAching about online sales... that guy, despite having been in the business for 30 years, is on the forefront of where our industry has to go.
I kind of think the future diveshop will be service and airfill centered. The margin is gone on gear sales and the longer it takes an individual LDS to concede that point, the worse off it will be as they then play catch-up to the shops who embrace it early on. I can see distributors having to get more involved with the individual, possibly hiring more phone flunkies to field questions, but the biggest winners in the whole shift are going to be UPS and Visa.
Change is difficult for the vast majority of human beings to accept much less embrace.
Difficult but inevitable none the less.