In my area, there's exactly three stores(out of better than a dozen) that I know of who sell any kind of BP/W in their stores. Two of them have 1 model each. The one store that has an OMS on display only probably also has 50 name-brand BC's available immediately. So some of it is probably availability.
sjspeck:
I don't know much about BP/W's, most of the time if I ask about them it's come back when so-and-so is here, he's the tech guy and can explain it.
It seems a lot of people with little knowledge about BP/W seem to be its biggest detractors.
sjspeck:
I think most beginning divers just want simple, and simple is a BC with weight pockets so that you can lessen weight as you become a better diver. Also comfort has to be a big factor for the average diver. Why don't dive resorts rent BP/W's for instance?
No, simple is a BC without a lot of crap hanging on it you don't need. Lack of effort is a BC with weight pockets that you can lessen weight as you become a better diver. Dive Resorts don't rent BP/W because they have to be adjusted per-diver which takes time and effort. Since the BC's they rent come in generalized sizes, you can throw them on anyone and get tell the diver "this fits". It fits in the sense you can get it on you. Comfort has nothing to do with it. A properly fitted BP/W is FAR more comfortable than any jacket I've ever used, including my Zeagle.
sjspeck:
I think the higher level of diver sophistication on SB tends to be why there's a lot more BP/W discussion here. Some of my more newly certified friends just give me blank stares when I discuss them, even some that have heard of them dismiss them as "tec gear"
I think SB offers more discussion of BP/W because the "mystery" is stripped away. It's not some tech gear. It's a basic diving BC. Nothing more.
sjspeck:
For me though, I'm keeping my Ranger. It does what I want, is more comfortable since I will never wear a wetsuit, just a t-shirt mostly. And in this age of ever shrinking baggage allowances, I'm guessing that the Ranger w/o weights packs a lot lighter than a BP/W. I'm a big buoyant person so I normally dive with 12-16 lbs of weight that I get from the diveop at my destination, bringing that much in a BP/W design would mean probably having to pack a second checked bag, which I don't want to do.
Enjoy your ranger, though It weighs more than a BP/W, and it packs in twice the space if not more. Your Ranger is what is making you wear half the weight you think you need. So lets see. You'd need less lead on the belt, you'd save packing space, and the unit would be lighter than what you have now. Hmmmm...
sjspeck:
Also, I've seen dozens of inquiries here about adding weight pockets to a BP/W, what's up with that? And pull the Ripcord and I'm going up, I'm not sure what you jettison on a BP/W in an emergency? The whole thing? Maybe someone can help here.
Adding weight pockets to a BC is something that people used to diving a common BC ask. It's totally unnecessary. There are a lot of ways to carry weight without resorting to that. The ripcord idea seems nice. I had one. However, I cannot think of any time when I am conscious that I would ditch weight at depth. Ditch at the surface? Maybe. But if weighted properly, and carrying I won't need to ditch at the surface. So I have no ditchable weight on my rig.
sjspeck:
Surprisingly I did have an early BP/W sort of BC when I first started diving. It was an At-Pac which had a wing on the back mounted to a hard plastic tank holder that carried integrated lead shot weight. There was a quick release at the bottom to dump the shot all over the reef in a emergency. So I guess it all comes around.
Things have moved on a bit since then.