Redundancy all the way!
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
Sometimes you can explore all of it with double 50s... Not all of them have miles upon miles of passage. Sometimes a bigger tank is just too big to get in, and small tanks must be utilized. Even if not the case, I'd hate to push into some cave, only to have the regulators fail on my single tank... and be screwed. All your eggs in one basket?
First off, you can get into deco on 1/3rds of smaller tanks(I've done it). I'm not talking about safety stops. Second, this isn't only about deco, this is about redundancy for technical applications, which can go beyond just a soft overhead(deco). It could mean an actual overhead. Either way, diving thirds with added conservatism if necessary should be enough to get you out, if you lose a tank.
Thats the entire point of diving thirds.
You should go ahead and agree with everything in my posts, cause its all fact
Redundancy
In a technical situation, you often have an overhead, literally, or by means of manditory decompression stops. If you lose one tank, you want another at your disposal to get you to the surface.
Wouldn't you get the same from one larger tank and an H-valve? Don't know since I dove doubles but the OP was talking about weight advantage of a single and in that respect wouldn't a large single with an H do it? I imagine small doubles would have a lower profile and balance better though.
Wouldn't you get the same from one larger tank and an H-valve? ...................
Wouldn't you get the same from one larger tank and an H-valve? Don't know since I dove doubles but the OP was talking about weight advantage of a single and in that respect wouldn't a large single with an H do it? I imagine small doubles would have a lower profile and balance better though.
No one said you can't dive into a deco obligation with small tanks. I know idiots that do that on a regular basis!! The fact that you state ..."diving thirds with added conservatism if necessary should be enough to get you out, if you lose a tank." illustrates the small safety margins diving like this.
There is always one thing you take in abundance and that is gas!!!! Not seeing with what the absolute minimum you can get away with.
I agree to some extent. The tank sizes mentioned I believe is to small especially for deco (I assume you are talking deco and not safety stops), as half the gas (in the event of "losing" one tank) will not be enough to get you out. I think these size doubles in general is to small if used with rules of 1/3 in any case.
..............All things being equal, why would losing a tank at 1/3rds, not get you out?
Why are 40s, 45s, 63s and other smaller tanks too small to be dived at 1/3rds and larger tanks are fine(again)? Wheres the logic in that? ................
Wouldn't you get the same from one larger tank and an H-valve? Don't know since I dove doubles but the OP was talking about weight advantage of a single and in that respect wouldn't a large single with an H do it? I imagine small doubles would have a lower profile and balance better though.