- Messages
- 17,334
- Reaction score
- 13,744
- # of dives
- 100 - 199
I've only seen a couple of 300bar cylinder, not popular here because of weight. I'm presuming twins would be better than a single 300bar for gas volume, maybe 300bar better as a single for weight in cold climate but I know @Storker uses 300bar so perhaps he can shed some light as to teh benefits (apart from the obvious)
Pro 300 bar: Lower water volume, so:
- Lower buoyancy, so less lead on the belt
- Takes up less space in the trunk for the same capacity
Con 300 bar: Compressibility kicks in at 230-240 bar, so:
- Capacity only ~90% of nominal due to compressibility
- A PITA to calculate partial pressure blending
- For a decent fill, they really should be allowed to cool down, and the be topped up. Even if I overfill my tanks by ~10%, if I don't top them up, they're down to ~280 bar when I'm assembling my kit.
About total weight: up to 12L, they're ok. 15L 300 bar tanks are a b!tch to schlep (I had one of those, but hardly ever used it since I didn't need that much gas for a single dive and it didn't hold enough gas for two proper dives). My 10x300s weigh the same as what the 15x200 I had (and sold) weighed.
The 300 bar tanks/twinsets I've see around here have been 2x6, 2x7, single 10 and single 12L. I've standardized on 10L 300 bar since that gives me a couple of kilos less weight to carry compared to 12x232s, and at least 4kg less compared to 15x200s. And I have some 27-2800 surface liters, which is basically the same as I get from a 12x232 and only some 10% less than what I get from a 10x200.
Some people claim that getting 300 bar fills can be difficult, but I've never had that issue where I've dived with my own tanks. I guess there are regional differences.