1. The risk is not necessarily the rebreather itself, but rather the diver who is using the rebreather.
Many rebreather divers are already deep, extended range, extended bottom time, trimix divers. The problem that arises is that many newly certified rebreather divers move too rapidly along on their quest for deeper and longer dives. I know my instructor recommended (and some agencies require) 50 hours of recreational use on their units before they take normoxic trimix. But in reality... some people just start diving trimix right away. People exceed their limits. It's not the rebreather; it's the divers.
A rebreather is a tool like any dive equipment. For me and my buddies; sometimes it's the right tool for the job. Sometimes, it's open circuit.
Diving itself is risky.
2. Rebreathers have many advantages including as you stated; less gas used, longer dive times, less decompression, no bubbles.
On a 60' 1 hour reef dive, there may not be advantages, but certainly practicing using your tools are good ideas.
Let's think about a week long dive excursion without the capability of filling tanks. With a rebreather, you can take a milk crate with enough tanks for a week. Bring 1 keg of sofnolime, and you're good to go.
With all of the accidents that have occurred lately, I've yet to see one where the rebreather is truly at fault.