It took me a a while to put my finger on why this bothers me, but I think I can articulate it now. It is a false dichotomy.... it doesn't need to be either or. To be clear, I have no GUE training (and am actually a target audience for the original question, lol). But say I wanted to go the GUE route, learn their methods, philosophy, and equipment. I can also intend to dive on vacations with my wife with us both in poodle jackets and "traditional" short hose reg sets (even, god forbid, an AIR2!) and solo dive at times. Those practices (and intentions) do not automatically render me incapable of diving with different gear and methods (GUE team diving) when diving under different conditions (with a GUE team). Failing to maintain the training that the certification represents would render me not ready "to integrate into GUE dive teams at this level of training." Riding a motorcycle doesn't render me incapable of backing up a trailer... not backing up a trailer often enough to maintain the skillset does, regardless of what is done in between.I can see where an instructor might take issue with issuing a GUE certification to a student who makes a blatant show of intent to violate GUE philosophy, given that this certification might be taken by other GUE divers that he's a trained, competent and ready diver ready to integrate into GUE dive teams at this level of training. It doesn't seem fair to write that off as 'refusing to drink the Kool-Aid.'
The false dichotomy is what I see (admittedly from the outside) as the "Kool-Aid." So, for me, I will continue to observe threads where GUE methods and reasoning are discussed, read their articles, watch videos, and otherwise glean what I can.... without spending my very limited funds.
Respectfully,
James