They had a few time outs I believe, but I could be wrong.diver.net is still around and it’s older than SB, (late 90’s I think). It’s a Southern CA based board.
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
They had a few time outs I believe, but I could be wrong.diver.net is still around and it’s older than SB, (late 90’s I think). It’s a Southern CA based board.
It says, ©1997-2007 diver.netdiver.net is still around and it’s older than SB, (late 90’s I think). It’s a Southern CA based board.
Not that I’m aware of? There might have been some episodes if downtime due to hackers.They had a few time outs I believe, but I could be wrong.
Here goes mine:Well, there goes my contribution to ScubaBoard.
Congrats on your AOWBe sure to watch the embedded video!
Alberta's Atlantis: An entire ghost town is hidden under this popular Canadian lake
Lake Minnewanka is a gorgeous spot in the Canadian Rockies with a ghostly secret hidden just under its pristine surface.curiocity.com
25+ years ago but hey, thanks!!Here goes mine:
That was my attempt at being funny/annoying25+ years ago but hey, thanks!!
I knew that but then some others, ya just never know . . .That was my attempt at being funny/annoying
What stealth edits?I have no dog in this particular thread. But I have moderated other large forums before, and was meaning to ask about this issue. The tendency of some mods on this board to stealthily edit people's posts has always rubbed me the wrong way. Sure delete a rule-breaking post and notify the user, fine. Give them a strike and warn of impending ban, great. Even leaving a post up but removing a nasty sentence, and notifying the user their message has been altered could be okay. But changing the actual content of what somebody says behind their back (even if objectionable) is nasty, slimy, and raises all sorts of problems. Trust, integrity, free speech, and potential for abuse first of all (although some of the more facistic moderaters I've known might argue that those don't exist on their forums) and secondarily the offender never even knows they posted something objectionable if it's edited without notification. If you stand by doing stealth edits, why? What is the moderation guideline here on this? What was the thinking on that policy?
Indeed.Moderators should not have to answer questions as they're there as a last resort, when things have got out of hand.