We have frequent flyer miles to burn... and your pictures of the PI look incredible... It's on my list of "must dives" - do you know when it is?Diver Dennis:Much less expensive too.
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
We have frequent flyer miles to burn... and your pictures of the PI look incredible... It's on my list of "must dives" - do you know when it is?Diver Dennis:Much less expensive too.
howarde:I had been shooting in ISO 100 - which is the lowest ISO setting on my camera. I was doing this for the highest quality and least amount of grain to my photos. It was suggested to me by a respected photog, to try shooting in AT LEAST ISO 200 instead, that I wouldn't really notice a quality difference, but I would have higher F-stops available, giving greater DOF flexibility. I tried it and liked it so far.
I was just wondering what other people did, and why - also probably you should mention what is the lowest setting that you have available.
Darnold9999:I shoot at ISO 100. Did read somewhere that the ISO setting in a digital camera isn't that useful as it just boosts the picture post CCD - you really can't change its sensitivity to light. You can do that post processing so why change? Having said that I often use 200 in the murk up here as I can then see what I have on the LCD right away at 100 it is often pretty dark.
As I am a beginner would like to hear what others have to say re this.