So, in the dive shop, we were having this discussion about a deep cavern dive where the dive plan was 160ft... which is less dangerous?
I have been diving to 154 feet on air, sidemount, 3 feet visibility, overhead, total darkness.
The amount of gas narcosis is
significant.
Only a Gopro can recall your dive - unless something truly traumatic happens.
Warning beeps from your dive computer will get registered... sometime... later.
Maybe 5-10 sec delay.
Dexterity is lost.
You think you did something.
You did not.
Add a rebreather, with air/nitrox, and if it fails at this depth, you are dead.
Do it on trimix or on open circuit. The former is better, of course, and costs more.
If your rebreather will never fail (Prayers) then it migh be safer.
Things change radically if you have a trimix CCR
Is it safer to dive with a little narcosis
Well, is it
a little? The S-curve can be steep, indeed.
on a simpler system (sidemount on air with o2 deco), or is it safer to be clear headed on CCR (a rig that is trying to kill you)? (Assume the diver is trained and comfortable with both.)
A CCR will give you much more time, hence safer.
Just make sure you
DO NOT have a manual nitrox CCR (Killing you softly).
If the CCR fails and you cannot cope with that, then you die.
Why the question: because helium is expensive, so open circuit trimix is not a realistic option.
How about a semi-closed?
OK, so take the risk, but instead of one dive, make it a project of 6 progessively longer dives, and please stage some emergency gas on your up line.
I could not find statistics about this, so I am asking the question.