flymolo
Contributor
an unfixable mechanical failure on ccr would just drop you right back onto OCBut that’s what I’m saying, with equal levels of training a CCR is more dangerous than OC ( with a CCR there’s more chance of a mechanical failure)
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
an unfixable mechanical failure on ccr would just drop you right back onto OCBut that’s what I’m saying, with equal levels of training a CCR is more dangerous than OC ( with a CCR there’s more chance of a mechanical failure)
Risk encompasses likelihood of a failure AND severity of consequence. You're correct that there are more things that could go wrong (equipment-wise), but you seem to be missing the fact there are far more options to handle failures if they do. In OC terms, it's like comparing manifolded doubles vs single tank: yes, doubles increases the probability of equipment failure, but the reduction in severity of consequence vastly outweighs that.But that’s what I’m saying, with equal levels of training a CCR is more dangerous than OC ( with a CCR there’s more chance of a mechanical failure)
Proper training is what’s needed to reduce human error whether OC or CCR. But a mistake on CCR has proven a lot more fatal.Risk encompasses likelihood of a failure AND severity of consequence. You're correct that there are more things that could go wrong (equipment-wise), but you seem to be missing the fact there are far more options to handle failures if they do. In OC terms, it's like comparing manifolded doubles vs single tank: yes, doubles increases the probability of equipment failure, but the reduction in severity of consequence vastly outweighs that.
Risk also includes the diver, not just equipment. While you may be able to function adequately while narced, that's not the norm. (I also believe even you would handle issues better/more quickly at 60 ft vs 160 ft, lessening the chance of a cascade/spiral of issues.) The self-awareness goes down on deep-air, and the likelihood of (non-equipment) problems goes up. The severity of consequence goes up. That means risk goes up and safety goes down.
Is that a post in favour of OCan unfixable mechanical failure on ccr would just drop you right back onto OC
no just means that a failure of the ccr is a nonissue as long as you have adequate bailoutIs that a post in favour of OC
haha it kinda sounds like this thread isn't really asking hypothetical question and maybe someone is just looking for justification to do something dumb?So if the post was...
If I have no training on CCR and a fair bit on OC, which is more dangerous on a random deep cave dive that isn't properly trained for?
That sounds more like the real question.
Unfortunately, all too common at the dive site that I believe OP is referring to. Known to many locals as the "stroke pit" due to the number of divers doing sketchy dives here on the regular. We had a double fatality recently with two single tank divers on air going down to 140' or so in the no-light zone and running out of air.someone is just looking for justification to do something dumb?
Mistake on OC due to nitrogen narcosis is more likely to kill you.mistake on CCR has proven a lot more fatal.