The fellow who taught my Cavern and Intro classes also teaches technical diving. He uses a pure dissolved gas decompression strategy, and one deco gas . . . 100%. He has done this for years, and taught it, and he's not a pretzeled cripple yet. So, although I suspect this is not the best decompression routine you can use, I hold it in the back of my head as a way to get as shallow as possible, as quickly as possible. As the best diving instructor I ever had put it, "You can fix bent; you can't fix drowned."
Reading the proceedings of the DAN Symposium on technical diving, I was struck by the fact that there is no evidence at all that very deep stops are useful, and I believe (unpublished communication) that there are some research studies being done that suggest that decompression strategies utilizing very deep stops are resulting in higher bubble grades. And although bubble grade is not an adequate proxy for DCS, if the deep stops are DESIGNED to control bubble formation and they do not do it, then we are wasting deco time and gas doing them.
The bottom line is that no one knows what the best shape for deco is, or even in some cases how MUCH deco is sufficient, or ideal. We know that at least several different approaches result in uninjured divers. In a last ditch, desperate attempt to get out of the water (which is how I see the OP's question) I would get shallow and spend as much time there as I could. Yes, that's "abandoning" the deco model I prefer -- but I would have had to abandon many of the other principles by which I plan such dives, to end up in such a bind.