What's wrong with being a recreational diver?

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

What's wrong with being a recreational diver?


Not a darned thing!

Just being neutral and underwater is a kick to me. If you see yourself with an interest follow it. If you find yourself in a happy place in terms of training then dive with a spirit of continuous improvement and you will continue to challenge yourself. If you are so inclined make yourself available as a mentor for the type of diving you enjoy.

Personally I get sick on boats and prefer to avoid medications. Springs are dead holes in the ground and wrecks are boats that failed. Quarry's are the novelty act of the diving world and I don't get caves. That's me, obviously there is a world of divers you find their bliss elsewhere.

As long as I can enjoy about 100 dives a year averaging an hour get in the water 90 minutes after logging off at work enjoy dozens of regional sites and make an occasional trip the sport is taking me places I had never planned to go and I'm good with that. The adventure is what you make of it.

Pete
 
recreational diving is where its at. I live in a good spot-not great, but good. To me, perfection would be an area rich in life, super clear and warm water with a max depth of between 20-40 feet. I only dive deeper because I have to...and for me, deep is probably 90 feet max. Short bottom time is a downer.
 
I wonder what is the mad rush some divers have to move so quickly from recreational to "tech" diving?

I don't see a mad rush, but there are folks here picking up the skills, and gear. You probably know it is done one class at a time, and not like one big certification.

Our local instructor teaches the technical courses. He posts the details of the dives that he and some of the guys do. It looks challenging and interesting. And, the instructor is one that a lot of the young guys look up to. They want to be a diver like TJ.
 
That's like saying the only way to drive a car is like Lewis Hamilton and anything less than that is inferior. It's ridiculous.

C.

and just how many people said to themselves "Lewis who?"
I caught the reference but I would have caught it even if he had pulled out some old fart like Sterling Moss. ;)
 
I love recreational diving. I also enjoy a little deep diving now and then. Some of my YouTube videos were shot well below 200 feet and I enjoyed making the dives. For several years, most of my diving was in the 130-240' range. These days I can be found at my favorite beach dive site, where I spend most of my dive above 80 feet. Many times I spend an entire dive in less than 25 feet and love it. If I could only dive in recreational depths for the rest of my life I would still be happy.
 
I've been a rec diver for 25 years....I personally find nothing wrong with it.....
 
Nothing wrong with recreational diving at all. One could even question the whole opposition "recreational" vs. "technical" diving. After all, all the tech divers I know or have met do it in their spare time and for fun, which to me equals recreation. When I ride my mountain bike along a trail that is considered "very technical," would that lead me to say "This morning, I'm going tech riding. Anyone joining me?" How ridiculous would that be?

Personally, I have ventured into tech diving a little bit (SDI Solo Diver Course, TDI Deco Procedures and Advanced Nitrox, currently assembling my first set of doubles) and I'm very intrigued by everything that goes along with it. However, it's not because I am bored with "recreational" diving. I can't even come up with a good explanation, because I couldn't care less about collecting china from some stupid ship that happens to be on the ocean floor. I think ocean liners are really boring, and if I really wanted to go see one, I would visit a harbor museum or something. As an underwater photographer, I have a hard time justifying my forays into "technical" diving. I think what appeals to me is the different mindset: You cut all the marketing crap and BS that is taught to "recreational" students. I'm sick of the crap that passes for "diving education" these days. You can be a clueless and careless monkey and get certified. I like the challenge of "technical" diving - if you make a mistake, you may be in serious danger. To me, this kind of challenge and succeeding is a big draw. It's more about challenging yourself and the enormous gratification of achieving something not because you were lucky, but because you were prepared and put skills and knowledge to use not everybody has. Perhaps climbers feel similarly about their sport - after all, what's there to see on top of a mountain except the ever same snow and rocks?

In technical diving, the proportion of "clueless and careless monkeys" is definitely smaller than in "recreational" diving. It kind of weeds out the folks who are not serious about it. You have to be REALLY into diving and interested in physiology, theory, physics and what not to make it work. I'm a scientist at heart and immersing myself in abstract concepts, learning about physiology and all that appeals to me.

Lastly, "technical" diving is surrounded by an aura of venturing beyond the limits visited by the crowds and i like that, too. Doing my solo diver certification was an eye-opener to me, and whenever I have the chance to dive by myself, it almost becomes a spiritual experience. Just me and the ocean and nobody else - I can count on one hand the moments in my life that I felt similarly happy and satisfied.

So, in summary, I'd say there is absolutely nothing wrong with "recreational" diving, only with the way it is taught and sometimes practiced these days.
 
I will be a recrational diver for a long time to come. I don't see any need to advance until I get bored. Which I don't see happening for a long long time
 
There's nothing wrong with it and all the diving most everyone here does is for recreation. You may have noticed that diving encompasses a great diversity of persons and personalities.

Some people live where there's not much to see unless you go deeper to see the wrecks (Great Lakes might be an example).

Others just might be drawn to the goal of more training for the challenge of the training even if one could argue that they haven't maxed out what there is to see shallower or haven't gained all the experience that could be gotten in other ways. If it's what someone wants to do then that's all that matters.

It's not what attracts me but so what:)

It is an interesting subject and it does skew the results that you might expect in that if someone is at a certain tech level you might expect a certain level of experience, judgment, and ability all around but that's not the case necessarily today.

You can have those skills lacking in many areas but become super proficient in some specific skills but not be well rounded in many other areas/skills. I think that's a more recent trend. In the past if someone was doing "technical dives" more than likely they were well rounded in all areas. This is just my opinion/observation however...I have no real data to back it up.
 
Absolutely nothing. You will be able to dive most places with an advanced rating. Technical diving is definitely not for all, nor is it the requirement. I mean let's think about it. ALL tech divers were recreational divers first. They just found deeper, covered stuff that they needed extra training to go look at and play in. Whether you are Recreation, Tech, or Both, you dive. It's all good. Don't let anyone tell you differently.
 

Back
Top Bottom