PfcAJ
Contributor
Yup. But once folks start dying in "easy" caves (as labeled by so called experts) it's easy to argue for closing them all.that could happen with or without a rating system
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
Yup. But once folks start dying in "easy" caves (as labeled by so called experts) it's easy to argue for closing them all.that could happen with or without a rating system
it could but your not going to stop people doing things that have inherent risk -one could argue that by having a rating system it could prevent deaths by steering the prudent away from dives that are more serious, as Ive mentioned earlier the foolhardy or overly confidant already believe theyre ready and able.Yup. But once folks start dying in "easy" caves (as labeled by so called experts) it's easy to argue for closing them all.
The difference is that I'm just a dude as opposed to some sort of organization or body that rates caves.it could but your not going to stop people doing things that have inherent risk -one could argue that by having a rating system it could prevent deaths by steering the prudent away from dives that are more serious, as Ive mentioned earlier the foolhardy or overly confidant already believe theyre ready and able.
the training agencies already have a guidebook of sorts eg no overheads without training no deeper than 30 m for OW no deco dives without training etc. A guidebook or rating system on a particular dive can be prefaced by stating suitable qualifications and suggested dive experience then a description of the dive giving depths times squeezes etc
If someone came to you seeking advice on a particular dive site that you had thorough knowledge, wouldn't you ask them pertinent questions such as how long have you been diving what dives have you done before what training do you have? and wouldn't you advise accordingly? how is putting a description to a dive site on paper any different given that the description covers such pertinent questions as aformentioned.
not sure of the percentages but the way I see it is that theres a group of divers that are willing to listen to caution and advice and there are those that aren't a guide book giving a rating system will be pertinent to those that are willing to listen- to those that aren't it wont make a differance
I realize that whoever it is will not meet your criteria, but this sort of thing is done all the time in many different settings. To be as blunt as possible, it involves consensus building among experts. As I said earlier, I used to teach and manage the process. It is well established
I realize you are not from cave country so you probably aren't around that much but the people in charge of the cave agencies aren't what I would classify as the experts. The KUR and GUE guys for the most part are what I would classify as the experts in cave diving. Did you see the statement on Facebook by the CDS that there are no gold line T's in North Florida? If this isn't an example of the lack of experts at the CDS I really don't know what is.
I thought that they said there were no new gold lines t's? Either way, I wouldn't classify the heads of the agencies as the experts in something like this either. Honestly I wouldn't go to GUE either since their focus seems to be elsewhere these days, I'd go to the WKPP and KUR first....
@bamafan no sh!t, he clearly hasn't been to JB in a while since there are 2 gold line T's within full cave limits just by kicking... Granted, those are the only ones I can think of that are within "reasonable" limits, i.e. no DPV and/or stage bottles, but still....
Being goal driven is not necessarily a negative thing, and ego is required to strive for advancement and personal development but those words have connotations of bigheadedness and competitiveness,