Sorry guys, but when the numbers are BS, all you have to do is look for the incorrect data. Depth DOES matter, so in the previous example it is quite erroneous to use 8', espacially after 2.5hrs with which it's probably a 4 or 5 ft AVERAGE.
Also, even 10 minutes makes a difference. Did he accurately do 2.5 hrs?, and yes I understand he didn't do 77cf either. But the 4 or 5ft will more than offset his cf usage.
I don't want my next question to get lost, as I'm looking for some input, so I'll post it its own post.
By the way, the tub thing was a JOKE!!!!!!
I have more than enough actual diving data to back up my claim that very very few people, unless skip breathing, can have those kind of SAC rates. The data is not accurate. I don't have to tell you that you're wrong, it's more than enough for me to SEE it for myself with real diving experiences, with all kinds of "well dove" divers.
0.18 C'mon!!!!
Also, even 10 minutes makes a difference. Did he accurately do 2.5 hrs?, and yes I understand he didn't do 77cf either. But the 4 or 5ft will more than offset his cf usage.
I don't want my next question to get lost, as I'm looking for some input, so I'll post it its own post.
By the way, the tub thing was a JOKE!!!!!!
I have more than enough actual diving data to back up my claim that very very few people, unless skip breathing, can have those kind of SAC rates. The data is not accurate. I don't have to tell you that you're wrong, it's more than enough for me to SEE it for myself with real diving experiences, with all kinds of "well dove" divers.
0.18 C'mon!!!!