DaleC
Contributor
An awful lot of scientists apply Occam's razor to God and self-identify as atheists. What they're stating is just that they feel it 99% likely that God does not exist, even if there is no scientific proof, and they feel the burden of proof is on providing the proof that God exists[*].
[*] And for the religious people reading this, I'm not arguing that you have to entertain this viewpoint, but that a lot of scientists entertain this viewpoint.
In the spirit of simple discussion though, would those same scientists also claim that 99% of the universe/existance/reality is known. If not, what do they base their opinion on?
But I do respect this "they feel the burden of proof is on providing the proof that God exists" in the sense that I don't feel the need to prove anything to anybody but myself. If I discuss such matters it is just for discussion sake or to improve my own understanding. We each walk our own path that way.