Well, there's never any need to bash any agency. Just present the facts. I do partially agree, there would be a lot less need for a forum of this type if PADI didn't exist, but there would still be some questions that need to be answered.
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
It's ignorant to bash any agency ... it defeats the whole purpose of diving, which is (drum roll please) ...daniel f aleman:It's simply ignorant to bash PADI - without PADI the need for this board never would have existed.
daniel f aleman:Bob,
As usual, you say it perfectly.
I think that the biggest complaint about PADI is that it is a profit making company and necessarily behaves so. Unlike NAUI, say, which is a non-profit run by its instructor membership, of which has dive education as its mandate.
Hmmmm.
Hey...
Walter:NAUI isn't really a non-profit anymore. As I understand it, they have a non-profit organization that owns a for profit business. That doesn't make sense to me, but apparently it does to the lawyers.
Well, yes ... but that isn't the "contention" of this thread, which is ... I believe ... what people LIKE about their training agency.Walter:Not at all. Businesses should make a profit. Businesses should not make a profit at the expense of safety. The contention is (agree or disagree) that PADI makes a profit at the expense of safety.
NWGratefulDiver:Well, yes ... but that isn't the "contention" of this thread, which is ... I believe ... what people LIKE about their training agency.
NWGratefulDiver:I understand how you feel about PADI
NWGratefulDiver:Let's let the folks have a happy thread every once in a while ... it's good for the soul ...
... Bob (Grateful Diver)