What are the drawbacks of sidemount diving?

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

are people using sidemount yet for deep 240+ foot dives (particularly in cold, dark water)?

I dive the Eagle's Nest regularly in SM. Also have a SM dive on the Oriskany, to the props. BTW, H2O Below was very cool regarding my set up, no hassle at all. And I had a scooter as well.
 
Lynne, A few thoughts:
Sidemount rigs are very idiosyncratic, and you may have to pass through a very awkward and uncomfortable period before you get yours dialed in.
I would agree with the 'awkward and uncomfortable period'. I expected the BM to SM transition to be easier. Part of the awkwardness, however, may have been changing from the 'known' BP/W configuration, where my doubles were assembled, I had established the proper position of the tank bands, and the hose routing, weighting, gearing up sequence, etc were all worked out, to a new situation. In hindsight, the 'awkward and uncomfortable period' existed for BM, but was spread out over a longer time. If my first foray into doubles had been with SM, it probably wouldn't have been any more noticeable than it was originally with BM.
Sidemount loses you the ability to access all of your gas, if you have a first or second stage malfunction or hose blow.
I guess, in theory, you still have the option of moving a reg from one tank to the other after that gas supply in that tank is exhausted. So, technically, you still have access to all of the gas, in an emergency situation. It is certainly not as easy as manifolded doubles, obviously.
Sidemount setups are a bit more of a pain to get into, as compared with backmount, where you spend the time assembling the setup, but once you have done that, you shrug in and are good to go.
Yes, at first, and this is one of the things that I found I did not initially like about SM (in reference to your 'Other side' thread), in addition to the challenge of accessing my thigh pockets. Over time, I found that the amount of time I spent assembling my BM rig - attaching the wing and BP, attaching the regs, connecting the inflator hoses, etc. - wasn't all that different from the time I spent setting up the SM tanks, attaching the regs, etc., and I could more easily don my Nomad and then clip my tanks on and attach the inflator hoses as fast or faster than slipping into my BM rig. I initially spent a bit more time carrying the rigged SM tanks individually to the water's edge, and then clipping them on after I was standing in the water - I futzed around a lot more at first. But, with practice, I found that SM wasn't more of a pain, rather I was just more used to the BM set-up routine.
I have this suspicion, too, that you have to do significant rerigging for different sorts of tanks.
Possibly. It may depend on how you set up your SM tanks. I don't use stage rigging kits, nor do I use screw-tightened metal bands for the bottom points of attachment. Instead, I use tank cam bands (2", not the DR 1.5") for the bottom, and bolt snaps attached to 'pigtails' - loops of nylon braided cord - for both top and bottom attachment. For the top, I just slip the loop of cord over the tank valve, then attach the reg. For the bottom, the pigtails run through a tri-glide on each cam band, held in place by the knot tied in the pigtail to form the loop and tension on the band. I can easily move the top loops and cam bands from tank to tank between dives if I choose. In addition, I can quickly change the position of the bottom cam band on a particular tank - move it up or down, or rotate it to adjust the orientation of the valve opening by fixing the bottom point of attachment - on the surface before splashing or even underwater during a dive.
 
Last edited:
Thank you, Colliam! Rob uses the cambands on his tanks, too, and it looks like a very nice way to make adjustment trivial. He puts them under a thick band of inner tube (or something) to protect the bands from un-camming with friction. It seems like a very workable solution.

I suppose you eventually figure out the precise placement of the bands for each tank. (I can see myself adding a whole set of calibrated strings to my pocket!)
 
The nice thing about diving with the stage straps, whether you use them for clipping or not, is that they do allow you to have the lengths preset. I have seen some people have them set up without the top clips on them so they have them for carrying and setting the tank length, which is pretty slick.
The cam bands are great because you don't have to worry about dealing with different diameter tanks and you don't need to take a screwdriver in with you until you get it all sorted out.
 
are people using sidemount yet for deep 240+ foot dives (particularly in cold, dark water)?

Bill Routh at Lake Jocassee. Diving to the flooded Lodge at 300' in 42F water. I have sen him dive that deep on SM a few times.
-------

I have a few friends going to SM instead of BM. They are older and say it is easier on their backs. The biggest reason I am not considering SM over my BM system is the lack of uniformity as of yet. Perhaps once things are more "dialed in" over all I will make a shot at it. I like the simplicity of the Bogarts design. A personal reason based on a lack of understanding, but until I know more, I would be lying if I said different.
 

Back
Top Bottom