fldivenut:
An ALU 80 and LP 80 are dry and empty roughly the same weight and dimensions (LP a pound or so lighter), and a HP 80 is smaller and lighter. I.e. any steel tank of the same size as an ALU tank will take weight of your total system in addition to provide much better overall bouyancy. (Steel is stronger than ALU and thus the tanks can be made thinner and thus lighter.)
This doesn't make sense. if an Al80 and an ST80 (LP) are the same weight and dimensions, then their bouyancy would be the same, thus the steel LP will not take weight off your belt. If an HP80 is smaller and lighter, then it might (depends how much smaller in relation to how much lighter).
Yes steel is stronger (and important to tank life, more elastic), but is also much denser (2.9 times as dense).
Aluminum, 6061-T6 2.7g/cc
Soft Steel (0.06% C) 7.87g/cc
In my own situation, given that I would have to change regs (mine are yokes rated to 3000PSI) or have them changed over to DIN (not sure parts to do so are available) inorder to use HP tanks. Never mind the fact I have 2 ST 72's (LP), 1 AL30 and 5 Al80's that are all yoke type valves, I won't be switching anytime soon.
And since, the tank part of the bouyancy equation does not change (ie, if you add 4 lbs of lead to offset the bouyancy of the tank, they're both solid materials not affected by depth so the 4lbs at 0 feet is still 4 lbs at 60 feet), the only difference is carrying that 4 lbs to and from the water. I just can't get that excited about dropping that 4 lbs.