Anyone who has followed this thread knows that I have a hard time believing that the prosecution has admissible evidence that would support a murder conviction. However, my gut tells me that something is amiss. I realize that everything that gives me that feeling can easily be explained away. But my gut tells me something is amiss. The fact that Tina died on her honeymoon while diving, after taking up diving to make Watson happy, offends my sensibilities. It just isn't right that such a thing could happen. And there lies the problem. Because what happened offends my sensibilities, I have this gut feeling.
If I have this gut feeling, others must have it, too. Look how quickly the media dubbed Watson "The Honeymoon Killer" -- and the media did not have a fraction of the evidence that we now have. The difference between me and most others is that I am pretty good at controlling my gut feelings. But it is human nature that once you get a gut feeling the only evidence that registers in your mind is evidence that reinforces your gut feeling. People tend to twist facts to support theories rather than theories to explain facts.
What I see time and again is people who seem to have the same gut feeling as I do lashing out at Watson for doing whatever it is that gave them that gut feeling. That's my theory and I reserve the right to change it as more evidence develops.
