Dan
Contributor
No one at this stage what type of eruption may (or may not) occur. Pyroclastic flows, ash, lava?
Evidently the 1963 eruption lasted for a year, but as we in New Zealand know, just because a volcano is in a state of eruption does not mean that it is hazardous to a wide area. It is an ash cloud that is hazardous to air traffic, but often air traffic can be safely routed around the cloud - just has occurred here in New Zealand with Ruapehu and Tongariro. Pyroclastic flows are very hazardous, but the distance they can travel isn’t so great - this will be one of the deciding factors in the current evacuation zones.
Until Agung's eruption really gets underway I don’t think anyone knows what will happen and even then trying to predict how long it will last? Again it’s a case of wait and see.
I just hope that it doesn’t go on for too long and that people stay safe and a minimum of damage is done to the diving areas close to Gunung Agung - afterall the 1963 eruption put the Liberty in the water where she is now
Agreed.
Here is more info about the type of eruption it may create, based on the previous data collected from 1808, 1821, 1843 & 1963 eruptions, the patterns were about the same, that is explosive, shooting up firing rocks, molten lava, raining of pyroplastic lava & ash. Unlike the Eyjafjallajokull eruption in Iceland in 2010 that was emitting a lot of ashes and creating commercial jet traffic problem to about 20 countries, the past Agung eruptions did not produce such thick & wide spread ashes, according to the News Conference for Anticipation of Mount Agung Eruption taken place on Monday, Sep 25, 2017 (2 days ago) in Jakarta that I posted earlier the first couple pages of the presentation. I uploaded the full PDF of the presentation in my Dropbox, below. Unfortunately it is in Bahasa Indonesia. You can use Google Translate to decipher the content:
Dropbox - 45787_Konferensi pers antispasi erupsi Gunung Agung_25 Sep 2017.pdf
The plume of ash may hover within the island and head in northwest direction, according to this model:
Last edited: