Great post.
I agree with teaching OOA procedures are nessary. And I also agree that maybe teaching that if you run out of air will most likely die. I often hook up with buddies that hardly ever check thier remaining gas supply. It always suprises me that so many divers don't cross check with thier buddie's gas supply.
Okay, I've been reading on this thread for a week and still have not gotten through the whole thing. It's quite impressive. But I need to take some exception to how we are phrasing this problem. Why? Because, as a scuba diver who is not in an overhead environment (including being well within the NDL), you are never out-of-air (OOA)! Remember diving physics and the Universal Gas Law?
P1V1/T1 = P2V2/T2
This means at 33 feet I have the equivalent of two of my lungs full of air if I head for the surface. At 66 I have three, and at 99 feet I have the equivalent of 4 lungs full of air, even if the scuba has nothing in it. In addition, the same goes for the scuba unit itself. So when someone says they were "out-of-air," they really mean that they had no more air to draw from
at that depth. But, they had plenty of air to make it to the surface.
When I was an instructor, NAUI had a requirement that before the class ended, the scuba student had to be able to swim 20 yards underwater with only a swim suit (and maybe goggles). I regularly breathhold swim 50 yards underwater with fins. Fifty yards is 150 feet, on one lungfull of air. How far can I swim on three lung fulls of air? Further, I will assure you.
In the US Naval School for Underwater Swimmers, we had to do a buoyant ascent from 30 or so feet. We would swim down to a bell, and then we'd duck out of it and hold onto the side while an instructor filled up our life vest with air. We would then do a "blow and go," exhaling as much air as we could easily do, then letting go and exhaling to the surface--we still exhaled a lot of air. We have what is called a "residual volume" of air in our lungs--air we cannot exhale. In that 30 feet it was enough that we continued exhaling through the ascent. The new information from the DAN site shows that this is no longer a good method of instruction, as there have been embolisms because of lung over-expansion from free ascent training in Europe. However, it was taught to a whole generation of Navy divers, and shows the concept well that we are not "out-of-air" at depth.
The notion that if we run out-of-air at depth we will die really ignores this basic fact of physics. What really we mean is that if we run out-of-air at depth, and stay at that depth or even need to go deeper, we will die. But there is plenty of air to make it to the surface. This is a very good reason for not pushing the no-decompression limits.
SeaRat
PS--SoCalRich, you might try using the spell-checker