Lost yoopers-
We'v had good discussions about things surounding this issue before, so I guess we know each other prety well now.
You are a DIR and TECH enthusiast. I am a somewhat old-fashioned conservative, with an open mind.
As I said- I acknowledge the DIR concept, I think it's a good concept. I think it wouldn't work for anyone. Know what does work for (almost) anyone?
PADI. I dont like it but it's true. They give the pase, they are the biggest.
How is it connected to the issue?
That's a bit trick, but I'll explain.
The strategy of PADI, and most of the other organisations is that ANYONE can become a diver. If you want to keep anything as simple as possible to make this assumption close to true, you have to use standard equipment. BCs are part of it.
NOW- though I am known as an anti PADI, I'd have to agree on this. Ordinary BCs are simpler tha BP. It's a fact, and you can all scream to heavens, but it's still true. I agree that everything that can be done with a BC can be done with a BP, but with a BP you can do MUCH more than with a BC. I agree that there are endless possibilities for use with BP. But that's not the point. Someone that just got certified, and goes for his first dives without an instructor, shouldn't be using a piece of equipment he is not used to. He should keep everything as simple as possible. When he get's experienced, he can try new concepts. And still, after hundreds of dives in both ways, I keep the BP for dives that need it, and the BC for the dives that won't require a BP. A big part of the reason is my back, it feels way better with the back system of an ordinary BC.
Want another reason?
Let's talk rescue. If someone needs to rescue you and you weare a BP and it's a system he's not familiar with, it will be harder for him.
This can go on forever, but people, really, no reason why a brand new diver should buy himself a BP. waste of money.