Tips on starting diving doubles

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

Just wanted to add: If it's an option to do some weight training, this is incredibly helpful for diving doubles. I have been shore diving with doubles in CA for a number of years and previously thought it was not attainable as a small-sized human. Weight training was necessary for me, in my opinion, to do it safely and have fun.
 
@njl I do a decent bit of upper body and legworkouts, and for my build I’m fairly strong. I just know I’ll be more comfortable carrying ~80-90 lbs than ~120. I think I could manage double hp 130’s ok, but if nothing else, I don’t know that my boat could lol
 
I would not go mucking around with yoke regs on a set of independent right handed valve tanks. That's a recipe for a flooded reg at best.

Seems like you are several upgrades away from doubles.
What? Why not?
I made hundreds of dives just like that. Two standard AL80 with right hand valves and yoke. Sometimes I turned the left tank around (180° ish) so it was like the manifold and just had the reg on "backwards".
Sometimes I turned the left one so that the valve is at the base of the neck (CCW 45°ish) and I could operate both valves with my right hand.
Independent doubles does not suck.
 
@Nick_Radov Per my understanding, my rig would be safe so long as I'm positively buoyant, minus any ditchable weight. So, for example, if I'm say, six pounds negative at the start of the dive, neutral at the end, and carrying six pounds of lead, all of which is ditchable, my rig would be safe, correct?

Simplistic example, of course, but the principle holds the same. In practice, I would have more than six pounds of air weight being lost with a twinset, but essentially my point here is that at any point in the dive, I can drop weight to achieve positive buoyancy, and even ignoring that, could in theory swim up just fine even without dropping lead, since the ~12 lbs negative I'd need to be at the start of the dive is manageable by use of fins. This is not even getting into the fact that, in the environment I'm planning to use this system in, I could crawl out if I needed to, or, failing that, drop my whole rig and swim 20-30 feet straight up.

Please let me know if my understanding is flawed here. I've seen several discussions on "balancing" a scuba rig, and many people on here seem to have different opinions of what that term means. I'm not a GUE/DIR/any kind of technical diver myself, I'm just trying to stay at about 30 feet for around two hours at a clip, so some of this stuff is a little above what I'm familiar with. Also worth mentioning I won't be using this in places that don't have a hard bottom (at 30-40 feet, max) which adds to the safety factor. Still, if my understanding is flawed here, do let me know.

@gordonscuba Several other people have already made the point about manifolds. I've said I'm looking into it. Need to put the whole thing together and figure out a few basic issues (such as whether my LP 72's are even appropriately sized for my wing) so that if/when I do buy a manifold, I know the stuff I'm putting it on actually works.

Also, your use of hyperbole doesn't really add to your argument, and in fact makes it less compelling. Independent doubles is not like skydiving with a knitted parachute. Better example, from what I've been told so far, would be to compare it to diving with a parachute made in the 1970's. Not suicidal, or even dangerous, if the thing is well maintained and checked off thoroughly, but perhaps not the wisest course. Also bear in mind, some other people, both in this comment thread and elsewhere on this site that I've seen, would dispute even that, so acting like it's a completely insane idea is rather silly, don't you think?

I acknowledge a manifold would likely be better. I'm just chewing on how best that can be integrated. I'm also, transparently, planning to test independent twins in a safe environment with a buddy nearby. If nothing else, I fail to see the danger of it, and it will be a good learning experience. Not like it'll cost me anything but time, after all.
Dude,
You are overthinking this.
One regular tank on the back and sling a second one as a stage. 1st stage with a single 2nd stage tucked in a bungee.
Easy to set up with a tank strap and a couple of bolt snaps, double enders, swivels or whatever.
Two tanks, double the time.
 
If you're going to dive doubles, buy an isolation manifold and opposing valves, but I wouldn't dive twin 72s wet if you paid me. Been there, done that. Don't bother.
 

Back
Top Bottom