Sounds like you're well on your way to a study proposal!So lets theorize a study that goes something like this...
Dive shop A located in a tropical dive location takes out four boatloads of 20 divers out each day. Two AM trips, two PM trips. Some divers may take both trips, but lets guess we're looking at 60-70 divers every day are heading out. They have made the decision that they want to dive and that they feel well enough to do so.
It is quite safe to say that 40%+ of folks in the US have had covid (that number is likely significantly higher, but its what the CDC is reporting). The CDC does acknowledge that 90%+ of kids have had covid. Think adults are really that far behind?
What was the SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence among US adults during 2021 and 2022?
In a recent Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR), the United States Center for Disease Control and Prevention (U.S.-CDC) published the preliminary results of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) for August 2021–May 2022.www.news-medical.net
COVID Data Tracker
CDC’s home for COVID-19 data. Visualizations, graphs, and data in one easy-to-use website.covid.cdc.gov
so roughly 50% (or more) of the folks who have already self selected to go diving have had and recovered covid.
I would then postulate that it is acceptable to contact those divers a few days prior to their dive trip and attempt to enroll them in a study where the participants are randomized to dive as planned or the day prior to diving have an exam to establish their fitness for diving.
By definition the study would not be taking any participants who were initially planning to get an exam and exclude them from an exam. The dive trip is already planned. If the diver wanted an exam before the trip they would have arranged for one. (These divers who did receive an exam would be excluded from the study). This study would instead only be taking a population of divers who felt they did not need an exam prior to diving and potentially obtain one.
Even if you only got 4 or 5 folks a day to agree to be randomized it wouldn't take more than maybe a month at a few sites to obtain a few thousand participants. Follow them for several weeks and I'd bet you'd see a trend one way or another as far as the risk of covid and diving goes for those who were minimally ill and fully recovered. Dive injury rates prior to 2019 could be used as a control.
If a researcher came to your IRB with something like what I proposed above, you'd vote to not allow it?
My own WAG; 90%+ of the population has had and recovered from Covid. That means that 90%+ of divers have had and recovered from Covid. If there was some danger related to having recovered from Covid and subsequently scuba diving the community as a whole should have seen an increase in dive related illness/injuries. I am not aware of any such increase. However, I will admit that my location isn't a diving hotbed and I don't practice dive medicine for a living, so I likely wouldn't have heard of any changes in rate of injury.
Best regards,
DDM