I guess I'm just one of those down to earth practical people who realize that this country and economy run off of oil.
...
For the life of me I can't understand why we refuse to tap the natural resources that we have such as drilling off the west coast, the east coast and in the Arctic.
...
High oil prices come down to supply and demand. As well as all the environmental restrictions that we have imposed on ourselves. Our new clean diesel costs about three times what regular diesel costs to produce.
There's down-to-earth practical, and there's short-sighted.
Our environmental restrictions are a political compromise, far weaker than they ought to be for our long-term health, but a grudging recognition that we've been treating the air we breath as the equivalent of using our reservoirs as cesspools to the point that we can literally see it.
The offshore and Alaska reserves are about all that's left under our political control. Considering how we've squandered everything else so quickly, how about we leave it there for a hundred years, or two. Using it now will ease the pain only very slightly anyway. Maybe our great-grandchildren will
really need it, and maybe not just to burn, and might have the technology to extract it with far less environmental damage.
If our real standard of living was reduced by half we'd still be far better off than most humans who've ever lived. Selfishly stealing from the future in so many ways so we can keep spending more than we can really afford is childish. No different really than maxing out your credit cards to keep drinking Starbucks.
The real problem is that there's way too many people, at least given our current technology. Just slow down. Think about how the next thousand years, and ten thousand years, are going to work out. I'd really prefer it didn't involve widespread famine and world wars for resources.