Exg Inflation Gas selector?

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

my preference for this type of diving is to put a second 3l on the back and use that for suit/wing inflation gas. This makes the rig symmetrical opposite of the O2 bottle and means you free up the space of the small inflation bottle. I have my rack mounted Meg configured this way and many will configure the CCR Liberty-Heavy configuration with the second large bottle as well.

I have a 4 bottle set up. left rear suit bottle does wing and suit, with a wing inflator bungeed in from the right post.

I'm not planning to buy the part mentioned but I was curious about more info and cost etc.
 
10/70 is expensive?
I will eat the $4 or even $10 cost of "wasting dil helium in my wing" to have redundant buoyancy which is a tech diving 101 super basic fundamental.
 
I will eat the $4 or even $10 cost of "wasting dil helium in my wing" to have redundant buoyancy which is a tech diving 101 super basic fundamental.
Wouldn't this be adding redundancy to the wing? In the event of a right post shut down, he'd still have both his wing and his suit.
 
Wouldn't this be adding redundancy to the wing? In the event of a right post shut down, he'd still have both his wing and his suit.
yes but at the cost of an inherently unreliable part being that it has a bunch of extra dynamic o-rings on the schrader valve and the shuttle mechanism to switch sides. On my rack I have the 3L that feeds wing and dil primarily and then I have the "standard" wing hose coming from the left post that stays disconnected. Basically what he's doing with the block except I have to unplug/reconnect. I'm not all that concerned about it being that much of an emergency though to swap inflation sources but personal preference. He may be doing a lot of different diving than I'm doing that the risk of taking the 30 seconds to unplug/reconnect could be catastrophic.
 
Graham makes those.

Pumping backgas from a set of LP50s into your wing adds up to a nontrivial amount of gas over the course of a few dives.

The switch lock makes it easy to switch to inflating via backgas if you needed to in a pinch. Otherwise people just leave the backgas hose dangling near the inflator so they can unplug the other hose and plug it in
 
I will eat the $4 or even $10 cost of "wasting dil helium in my wing" to have redundant buoyancy which is a tech diving 101 super basic fundamental.
Oh, I 100% agree. I think that’s the justification for using the splitter.
 
yes but at the cost of an inherently unreliable part being that it has a bunch of extra dynamic o-rings on the schrader valve and the shuttle mechanism to switch sides. On my rack I have the 3L that feeds wing and dil primarily and then I have the "standard" wing hose coming from the left post that stays disconnected. Basically what he's doing with the block except I have to unplug/reconnect. I'm not all that concerned about it being that much of an emergency though to swap inflation sources but personal preference. He may be doing a lot of different diving than I'm doing that the risk of taking the 30 seconds to unplug/reconnect could be catastrophic.
I'm not doing anything special just asking questions and discovering others crap 😁.
 
Graham makes those.

Pumping backgas from a set of LP50s into your wing adds up to a nontrivial amount of gas over the course of a few dives.

The switch lock makes it easy to switch to inflating via backgas if you needed to in a pinch. Otherwise people just leave the backgas hose dangling near the inflator so they can unplug the other hose and plug it in
Define "non-trivial"

My rough estimate is that about 50% of my dil usage is in the wing and the rest is into the loop. So ~4cf on a typical 200ft dive. That's 15/55 dil so ~2.5cf of actual helium. $2 usd per dive for the wing to have redundant buoyancy and not having to fuss with multiple whips if I have a failure in extermis
 
Define "non-trivial"

My rough estimate is that about 50% of my dil usage is in the wing and the rest is into the loop. So ~4cf on a typical 200ft dive. That's 15/55 dil so ~2.5cf of actual helium. $2 usd per dive for the wing to have redundant buoyancy and not having to fuss with multiple whips if I have a failure in extermis

It's not that this is new information to me, it's that with a little extra perspective I can totally appreciate the simplicity.

Thx!
 

Back
Top Bottom