I have to agree with PIPEDOPE.
That is a heck-of-a name you gave yourself. I'm guessing you are a steamfitter?
That is a heck-of-a name you gave yourself. I'm guessing you are a steamfitter?
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
First off, let us see how well GUE has control of ALL of their instructors when they get to the size of PADI. Please do not hold your breath while waiting. Holding your breath can be dangerous for extended periods of time.
People don't get "all the facts" before making a decision. It is simply not possible to get all of the facts. The other problem is that in the beginning you don't have the training, knowledge and experience to understand and evaluate the facts as they are presented.
The trap is assuming (we all know what that does, don't we?) that all of those choices made by the pioneers of GUE are still the best way to do it. As you gain knoledge and experience you need to keep testing and checking to see if you are making the best choices.
Here is a tip, if your answer to why something is done a certain way includes "JJ says so, or GI3 says so" then you probably need more study. Much better is to explain the reason why something is a certain way and what are the consequences of doing it differently
Sure, there are very good reasons in the DIR system to hang stage bottles on the left but saying "Joe diver once hung 7, or 8 or whatever bottles on his left and was fine" does not educate anyone to what those reasons are.
Right now, it is silly to even consider DIR for beginning divers because there is no OW entry level GUE course. Yes, I know that they are working on it but it is not here NOW.
Just out of curiosity, how many divers have been certified by GUE?
When an agency is small it is easy to maintain standards. As they get bigger it gets much harder
boomx5:That's not a very good argument against anything. That's like saying you never want to go to the doctor again because you've seen some bad doctors out there.
Boomx5,
I'll still go to doctors, but I'll only go to those with the qualifications, professionalism and reputation that match my standard. And it was not an argument.
Someone once said, "Intelligent people get all the facts before they make a decision". Everyone's entitled to their own opinion, but my suggestion would be to get more educated on what's taught in GUE classes before you make any assumptions about (dare I say it again) DIR. This is the answer to your own question: "I know PADI instructors that have no buoyancy control whatsoever. If it's so important to PADI, (especially on the IDC end) why are these people making it through with no buoyancy control (and I'm not talking fin pivots)?"
I don't think my experience with the group of "DIR" reflect the overall professionalism and standards of DIR, just like many PADI instructors do not reflect the standard of PADI. I personally have seen one of the largest PADI certificstion resort in Thailand/Asia having OPEN BOOK/TAKE HOME(hotel room) FINALS for its students!!!?? I was shock enough to contact PADI to confirm that was not the standard.
I do pick up good safety tips from DIR. The believe of "we are DIR, we have higher training standard than others", however, is stretching the truth. I know I would NEVER be caught dragging to the surface on a 7/8 ft? hose by a panic diver. I felt sorry and concern for the diver being dragged. Wish I was close enough to give a hand. But the scene was also very comical. This guy can't swim down cause he was dragged head up to the surface by this hose.... while he tried frantically to slow the ascent... tried to reach back to grab the hose and swim downward/horizontal at the same time.....
I would have handed the buddy my 3.0 cubic ft spare air and avoided the danger. If I have to use my octo, I could at least grab hold of the buddy to swim horizontal, at least have certain control. If you were there to see the accident, you will understand the safety benefit of long hose is a false assumption.
This is not a troll and not an invitation for heated argument. I just shared what I saw when diving DUane Wreck Last year.
fishnchips:I know I would NEVER be caught dragging to the surface on a 7/8 ft? hose by a panic diver. I felt sorry and concern for the diver being dragged. Wish I was close enough to give a hand. But the scene was also very comical. This guy can't swim down cause he was dragged head up to the surface by this hose.... while he tried frantically to slow the ascent... tried to reach back to grab the hose and swim downward/horizontal at the same time.....
I would have handed the buddy my 3.0 cubic ft spare air and avoided the danger. If I have to use my octo, I could at least grab hold of the buddy to swim horizontal, at least have certain control. If you were there to see the accident, you will understand the safety benefit of long hose is a false assumption.
OneBrightGator:Spare Air, you have got to be kidding, I'd rather my buddy drag me to the surface from the deck of the Duane then run out of air at 80 ft.
fishnchips:I don't think my experience with the group of "DIR" reflect the overall professionalism and standards of DIR, just like many PADI instructors do not reflect the standard of PADI.
NWGratefulDiver:A Spare Air won't get the average diver to the surface from 80 feet unless that diver exceeds a safe ascent rate.
I've seen the math in here before ... but basically considering that the type of person who's likely to carry a Spare Air is going to be relatively inexperienced, and with a relatively high SAC rate, it's safe to say that in an emergency their SAC could easily exceed 1 CF per minute. At a rate of 30 fpm, and coming up from 80 feet, they're going to run out of air at somewhere around 50 feet.
DA Aquamaster:I understand your concern but I do think it makes more sense to just ignore the person than to attempt to discredit them with personal attacks.
To be honest I am probably equally at fault in that regard due to the tone I took in stating my concern about your response. My aplogies. Things often just hit me wrong before the first cup of coffee in the morning takes effect.
In any case when anyone resorts to attacking someone's character in a debate rather than sticking with debating the facts, they just end up looking like a jerk and only hurt their own credibility.