Scuba
Contributor
dweeb:Most people seem to miss one thing. What sets DIR apart from most other diving paradigms is that it analytically examines all aspects of diving, and seeks objective optimization, with no consideration for the emotional vaguaries of 'personal preference.' Do they have the perfect system? No, but at least they're looking for it.
That's what it's all about - optimization.
It's not quite so simple. The problem with this argument is that in order to optimize a dive, you must consider all specifics and make a subjective decision This includes: participant divers, mission objective, environment, available tools, and so on. Along with sub categories thereof. When this is done as objectively as possible you will find that a gain in optimizing one aspect often results in a loss in optimization of another. Compromises have to be made. When the final decision is made you end up with a subjective, biased system. Others will agree and disagree with specific components and the overall system.
The DIR system is no different than others in this respect. The main difference is that others advise divers as to the choices they have - leaving the final decision to the individual. The DIR system demands strict adherance to its chosen preferences.