WJL
Contributor
fairbanksdiver:... here's the document I posted just before the thread was yanked.
Let's get this thing edited into a final form, and get it out to the local shops.. Betcha Aqualung won't like this one bit.
Someone please offer criticism / suggetions if anything in my letter isn't truthful / accurate.
I sympathise with the sentiment that prompted the drafting of this letter, but I disagree with the proposed solution it suggests.
The letter demands that AquaLung vigorously police its distribution chain to eliminate grey-marketers. The letter implies that this will benefit smaller LDSs, presumably by keeping retail prices high on AquaLung equipment.
The unspoken corollary to this view is that we divers are perfectly willing to pay higher prices for AquaLung products in order to support our LDS. I don't believe this is true. Not everyone is willing to pay higher prices for AquaLung products, just to support an LDS.
Not even Phil Ellis wanted that to happen. Phil wanted to sell AquaLung products for lower prices, not higher prices.
I believe, like Phil, that the best solution is to let the market decide where retail prices should be. Consumers and retailers should have maximum choice about where and how they want to trade. If a consumer wants to buy a product based solely on paying the lowest price, that choice should be available. If a dealer wants to sell a product at the lowest price of all its competitors, that choice should be available.
In other words, low prices are not evil. "Grey marketers" are not evil. Grey marketers exist and prosper because they are serving a need.
Some people, misguided and selfish though they may be, just want the lowest price, and don't care about service, warranties, or anything else except getting the product at the lowest price. Some dealers, callous and cynical though they may be, just want to sell a high volume, and don't offer individual attention and extra services to their customers.
There is a place in the world for low price bottom feeders, and their existence keeps prices lower for everyone in the market. This is how a free market economy works, folks.
So, I don't agree with the letter.
However, I do agree that AquaLung appears to be mismanaging its distribution chain, and its alleged mistreatment of Phil seems to be a symptom of that.
I can think of several ways for AquaLung to support LDSs and still sell to high-volume low-price outlets, without selective enforcement of a fictional minimum resale price policy. One way is for AL to bear the actual cost of warranty repairs regardless of where the product was purchased. AL could pay its certified dealers for both parts and labor for warranty repairs on its products regardless of where the product was purchased, much as the auto manufacturers do for warranty repairs on their products.
Several contributors to this thread and the prior thread have stated that AquaLung violated U.S. anti-trust laws in its treatment of Phil's shop. This point remains unproven. A manufacturer's unilateral enforcement of a minimum resal price policy is generally not a violation of U.S. anti-trust laws. Accusing someone (even AquaLung) of a crime is, however, a potentially defamatory statement. This may be what lead Phil to agree to having the prior thread pulled.