Where is the proof that up to 5% of the tanks/samples tested are not OK? What is the problem(s)?
Excerpting from
http://www.scubaboard.com/forums/ba...9-carbon-monoxide-tank-risks-protections.html which won Thread of the Month that month...
This question was posed to the labs by Bob Rossier, an ex-NASA life support systems engineer, in 1998 and 2004 and reported in the DAN Diver Alert magazine. When Lawrence Factor and TRI Laboratories, two of the largest compressed gas laboratories in the USA, were contacted and asked the frequency of CO contamination in dive air alone (fire service compressed air has a CO failure rate about 0.1 %) both labs reported independently in 2004 that the failure rate was 3 to 5 percent, an incredibly high percentage considering the high toxicity of this contaminant and potential for death in the underwater environment. In 1998 these same lab directors were asked the CO failure rate in diver compressed air and reported it was 5 to 8 percent so things have improved somewhat since that time but not by much.
You can read the thread for much more. Unfortunately, that 3-5% chance of bad air was for the compressors sending samples, collected under best conditions - so we can only guess at the quality during peak load conditions, when filters are old, etc. - and for the fill stations that didn't bother to send sample. Padi never enforced that requirement, then dropped it after a double fatality on Roatan.
What is the "contamination?" Is it CO? CO at levels that are hazardous to diving? Some other problem that is not detected by a CO tester?
Yes yes, CO - at hazardous levels. When you get CO tho, you got to wonder why and what else is also going in the tank?
Is it Cozumel wide or just one filling station?
It can happen anywhere. Hell, if it was just one place, you think I would have skipped that? Scuba compressors are much more demanding that the ones you find in workshops.
An added DM in the back on cruise ship customer dives can be done without newbies asking. As Blue XTSea notes, requiring a private DM for some divers can help without them asking.
Additional DMs would indeed help some, you see me urging new divers & first time Coz divers to hire one, but the ships are already ripping the customers off with double charges on dives and using questionable dive Ops - so how are you going to get them to add DMs? You might go after the local authorities to require such, but the ship companies have them by throat.
As far as how agencies send newbies to sea and how cruise boats treat newbies with C-cards, we can only help the ones who ask us. I don't know what bucks you have invested in changing that, but my work with technology has helped.
So are you finally accepting that CO is a real risk? I hope you have CO monitors in your home at least; they have a 5 year life expectancy you know.
And I am on your side for helping newbies, rusty divers, and pod divers to dive more safely, but how would you want to change this? And how many of your
"bucks" have you invested how to this, since you brought up
"more bang for the buck."