Scubagermany
Contributor
I personally did not! But there is a whole industry around it producing buffalo mozarella....Ever milk one?
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
I personally did not! But there is a whole industry around it producing buffalo mozarella....Ever milk one?
I would think of it more as self defense. The shark, it appears(and please correct me if I am missing something here), did not engage her until she was foolish enough to invade it's apace and engage it. These are the same types who can't figure out why the cute black bear, or bobcat, attacked them in the woods, when all they wanted was a picture. If you don't respect wildlife, It may seriously disrespect you.I'm not sure why people have a problem with "attack"? Do you have any alternative words that fit better than attack?
It certainly was not an accident?
Dogs can accidentally injure people with their jaws/teeth and I would not necessarily consider that an attack, simply because, perhaps, blood was drawn during the interaction. But if the dog removed an appendage from a human (and then ate it), I think I might call that a dog attack.
Correct you if you are wrong? I have no idea what actually happened. Do you?I would think of it more as self defense. The shark, it appears(and please correct me if I am missing something here), did not engage her until she was foolish enough to invade it's apace and engage it. These are the same types who can't figure out why the cute black bear, or bobcat, attacked them in the woods, when all they wanted was a picture. If you don't respect wildlife, It may seriously disrespect you.
Right. That shark in the article looks like a Sand Tiger Shark, not Bull shark.And even though they now know it was a Bull Shark, they still don't have a pic of the right species in the article.)
Thanks. I know it is a Sand Tiger in the image. My point wasn't that it was a Sand Tiger, it was that they knew it was a Bull and still got the wrong species.Right. That shark in the article looks like a Sand Tiger Shark, not Bull shark.
View attachment 884286
You can see the difference between Sand Tiger Shark & Bull Shark by looking at their heads, especially their jaws.
Here’s Sand Tiger Sharks that I saw in North Carolina:
Here’s Bull Sharks that I saw in Cabo Pulmo, Mexico:
I posted a link to an article in the "National Post" (it is post #39) that gives that info.I saw this posted on Reddit also and someone responded that the family has started a go fund me page that tells a much different story. The story on the page says that they were wading in hip deep water when the shark bumped her in the leg. When the shark came back around she stuck her hands out to push away from the shark and that’s when she was bitten. I cannot find the thread to link unfortunately.
I’m not saying that’s how things happened, but the practicalities of getting both hands bitten off make more sense if she was trying to push the shark away versus taking a selfie. The family’s version sounds a lot better for a go fund me. The article’s version sounds much better if you’re trying to generate clicks. I have no idea which is correct.
Whoops, missed that that point had already been discussed. Thanks for linking the article.I posted a link to an article in the "National Post" (it is post #39) that gives that info.
No worries. Is that similar to the article you read?Whoops, missed that that point had already been discussed. Thanks for linking the article.