passedoutwookie
Contributor
Yes, that is the same account I had read.No worries. Is that similar to the article you read?
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
Yes, that is the same account I had read.No worries. Is that similar to the article you read?
I have been on 15 Aggressor Turks and Caicos and while I have mainly seen nurse and reef sharks, have seen a hammerhead, a tiger shark, and a couple of bull sharks. Seeing other than nurse and reef sharks were rare.I have not seen any article on this whole topic that said that the person was scuba diving.. did I miss something? My understanding was it was a beachgoer
On another note, has anybody seen anything other than a reef shark, a gray shark or a nurse shark at Turks and Caicos? I only have about 40 dives there, but that's all I've seen.
I do love how every single shark bite article, they always post a picture of the great white shark... Bull crap.
The journalist just reported what he / she heard from the victim’s brother in-law, but may not necessarily know what a Bull Shark looks like and just pick a shark image.Thanks. I know it is a Sand Tiger in the image. My point wasn't that it was a Sand Tiger, it was that they knew it was a Bull and still got the wrong species.
The journalist just reported what he / she heard from the victim’s brother in-law, but may not necessarily know what a Bull Shark looks like and just pick a shark image.
In today’s Internet age where Google can return a picture in mere seconds …? Well thats pretty stupid, no arguments there… what kind of journalist or editor cannot do a quick Google search?LOL.
To most peoples, a shark is just a shark. Whatever it is is irrevalent to the incidence.
It isn't about what they can or not - but what makes sense. If the public is not interested in these details, why should they invest their time? Just makes no sense (at all)In today’s Internet age where Google can return a picture in mere seconds …? Well thats pretty stupid, no arguments there… what kind of journalist or editor cannot do a quick Google search?
What difference does it make whether it was a great white, white tips or whatnot.In today’s Internet age where Google can return a picture in mere seconds …? Well thats pretty stupid, no arguments there… what kind of journalist or editor cannot do a quick Google search?
What difference does it make whether it was a great white, white tips or whatnot.
A lot of journalists still believing that scuba diver breathing oxygen instead of compressed air(most of the time). Probably couldn't tell the difference between nitrox, heliox, trimix etc.
Yea you are right.
We do not have bison here.
But they are basically cows.
People in Germany do not endanger their lives by taking photos with a cow.
If I was there I would had laughed my head off but would certainly not correct the mistake. Others should have the fortune/misfortune of hearing something so ridiculous.I overheard a SCUBA diver on a recent trip while doing their paperwork just after arriving at a resort say "no I always use oxygen" in response to a question about nitrox. No, they did not have a CCR.