rjsimp
Contributor
TxHockeyGuy:Taking any students into any sort of an overhead environment, whether it qualifies as a swim through or not, is not what I would consider a great idea. That being said I have a problem with you insinuating that the entire park seems to not be interested in safety. I've met both of the owners and know that they are very concerned about the safety of the divers at the park and this accident has them very upset. I also dive at this park quite frequently and can say that safety does not take a back seat. The owners have setup a very safe park, the rest of your safety is up to you and your dive buddies. That being said accidents will still occur and they are just that, accidents. We do what we can to avoid them but you shouldn't be blaming "the park", there's nothing wrong with that park.
I am very sorry for the family's loss and I pray for them.
It really makes you think how any of us would react in an emergency situation. Even after training and knowing what to do in practice, real life is hard to practice.
I agree with you on the fact that safety is up to the divers to practice and not for a scuba park to dictate. There is only so much a park can do right?
The part that I do not agree with though and something they do have control over is setting up a "swim through" which IMHO is dangerous in many ways. It has entanglement potential, it has a narrowing opening as you swim towards the tail, it doesn't allow for a buddy to be next to you as you swim through. It is just not safe. After my kids were certified and we went to go see it, I wouldn't let them swim through it and I didn't either as a good example. It is fine for a sight seeing object, but should be modified to keep people from swimming through it for safety reasons.
Again, just my opinion considering this is primarily a teaching location.