ImpotentSeaSnake
Registered
I was recently scuba lion fishing in the Bahamas and the sharks were pretty bad. We were at a site called Pumpkin Patch and the DM had to abandon the Zookeeper until the sharks dissipated. Short while later when we resumed, they returned, were aggressive, and attempting to eat them off the spear. We dropped the fish and aborted the hunt.An approximately-identical incident happened in the Bahamas within the past year. Who hasn't heard "The pool is open" after divers are back on a boat, followed by divers down to their bathing suits jumping in. The evidence is clear, to me anyway, that sharks mistake swimmers for fish a lot more than they pose a risk to divers--and then the risk is quite small. My devotion to peeing at depth is validated.
I happened across this paragraph in a recent magazine article:
"When you go to the ocean this summer, you are not going to be eaten by a shark. We kill a hundred million sharks annually. They kill, in unprovoked attacks (those in which the victim was not attempting to feed or touch the shark), between five and ten of us globally. There are a further sixty-odd nonfatal unprovoked attacks reported each year. You are significantly more likely to be bitten by a person in Manhattan than you are to be bitten by a shark anywhere off the North American coast. In the same way that you are not going to win the lottery or become globally famous for your good looks and charm, you are not going to be attacked by a shark. They are not especially attracted to human blood and do not crave human flesh. Sharks—unlike, for instance, crows—never develop vendettas. In comparison, very conservatively, snakes kill eighty thousand people a year, crocodiles a thousand, hippopotamuses five hundred, and lions two hundred. You are more likely to die from constipation, tornadoes, or lawnmowers. Yet no frisson of terror goes through us when we walk past the lawn-care section at Home Depot."
Later I learned that people do this: