but RB's seem to be used more due to the individual diver's SAC rate requirements.
Which I feel like is a poor excuse for lack of training or experience (which then compounds itself with a rebreather).
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
but RB's seem to be used more due to the individual diver's SAC rate requirements.
The goal of diving a piece of equipment is backwards.If the end goal is to dive a rebreather, the sooner you get one(after becoming a competent oc diver) the better.
"mission requires it" is a good way to end up as a poor rebreather diver. I have yet to meet someone* that can switch back and forth and can dive an RB well *that isnt a professional in the water multiple times a week.
If you do one/2 trimix trips a year, a rb never works out to be cheaper. You dive it for all the other benefits.
Make a choice and live with it.
Exactly, that's what I tell everyone. Don't to dive a rebreather because it's fun. It ain't, honestly I love to dive OC way more than my rebreather. It takes a lot of money, time and dedication to dive them next to added risk. My advice is to only think about a rebreather if it's the right tool to meet your goal i.e. needing trimix to do the dive to a deep wreck or cave.The goal should be to go see stuff. If you require a rebreather to do it then ok. But gear for the sake of gear ain’t it.
If you can’t get a nitrox fill I think you’re going to have a tough time getting RB supportI don't, currently, dive CCR. But I do take dive trips to locations where fills aren't readily available and nitrox isn't available at all.
I can see where CCR would be a very useful tool for these trips even though the depth doesn't really require Trimix.
How has the threshold for “need to” changed over time?