Valeriy_Kulaha
Contributor
1. No computer can replace a mathematician. It is only an additional tool and makes the work easier. And it is the mathematician who should set the computer a task, not the plumber.I've bad news for you, there are things for which computer are an indispensabletool of mathematicians (and without the confusion you seem to have between maths and arithmetic, mathematicians aren't specifically good at arithmetic in general)
On the main subject:
- knowing how to use tables doesn't help you to understand the underlying phenomenon (it was the case when I learned to dive before DC were common, I don't see why it would be different now)
- having tables that you know how to use doesn't help you in case of a computer issue if you don't have a second source of time and depth, I prefer a second computer as redundancy source of info
- my usual profiles are such that they would mandate far greater deco if done using tables, I wonder how often I'd not have enough gaz with me for that exit path
- if you don't know what are your deco obligations at the time you detect a computer issue to surface safely, you don't pay enough attention to your computer
- in my practice, planning is also done with computers
2. Before studying the tables, it is necessary to study physiology
For example - why you can't hold your breath when ascending or equalize the pressure in the mask. Then about the tables and safe depths.
3.Depth and time control are the basis of safety
The most reliable and safe method is a capillary depth gauge and a mechanical watch. No batteries and a depth gauge without moving parts.
4. I consider a computer as a device that makes diving a little more comfortable. But in no case does it serve as the basis of safety. In this case, you value your life and health at the price of a computer battery.