Are you serious?
Serious or not I calculated based on XS Scuba tank specs.
XS Scuba Worthington Steel Cylinder Specifications
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
Are you serious?
Down to the 1/10th of a cubic foot, I bet their manufacturing tolerances aren't even that good.
Not that I would correct someone for being a couple cubic feet off the mark in the first place
Ever seen how steel cylinders are built? Or put a stack of them side-by-side and looked at how they compare to each other?So what you are saying is that LP85 and HP100 are the same size? Since they are only couple of cubic feet off?!?
Manufacturer lists it to one decimal point thus it stands to reason that it is that precise within margin of an error. Thus I've used them in calculation. Your initial point of calculation was over 2.5% bigger for LP85 thus compounding the error.
So what you are saying is that LP85 and HP100 are the same size? Since they are only couple of cubic feet off?!?
As pointed out earlier, the Faber 95's tend to be butt-floaty once you get them down below about 1000 psi or so. So if that's really the size you want, I'd either consider the Worthingtons or plan not to ever have them down that low.Sounds like LP95's are going to be my choice. Even if I can only get 2640 PSI fills the deepest dives I will be doing over the next year are going to be no deeper then 165 feet so I think 95's should suffice. Now I just need to decide Faber or Worthington, I can get a better deal on Faber and my instructor recommends them but I think I will like the bouyancy characteristics of the Worthingtons. With the fabers I was thinking I can just thread a weight in the cam strap. Is there any reason why I shouldnt put weights on the tanks?