XS Scuba
Contributor
Hi Rachel:
The Luxfer Limited has been available for about 3 years, so it's new, but not way new. You're correct that the ability to fill the cylinder full to 4350 psi is a factor that has limited the sales and popularity of this cylinder. Other limitations are the 3 year hydro / 15 year life, the only compatible valve is a dedicated 300 bar outlet, smaller 7/8 x 14 UNF inlet thread, relative high cost and the ability of the divers regulator / pressure gauge to handle the 4350 psi input. The ALW106 is basically a standard Luxfer 80 with the addition of the hoop wrapped fiberglass and resin, so the in water buoyancy is essentially unchanged. On the positive side is, if filled full, it's a bunch of gas in a small package. The majority of the sales of this cylinder have been for uses other then scuba.
The Luxfer Limited has been available for about 3 years, so it's new, but not way new. You're correct that the ability to fill the cylinder full to 4350 psi is a factor that has limited the sales and popularity of this cylinder. Other limitations are the 3 year hydro / 15 year life, the only compatible valve is a dedicated 300 bar outlet, smaller 7/8 x 14 UNF inlet thread, relative high cost and the ability of the divers regulator / pressure gauge to handle the 4350 psi input. The ALW106 is basically a standard Luxfer 80 with the addition of the hoop wrapped fiberglass and resin, so the in water buoyancy is essentially unchanged. On the positive side is, if filled full, it's a bunch of gas in a small package. The majority of the sales of this cylinder have been for uses other then scuba.
biscuit7:I'm totally intrigued by this new Luxfer tank...
The biggest issue I see is actually getting it filled to rated pressure since most fill stations don't even bank enough pressure to properly top these off.
Do you have any experience with these tanks and what is your general impression?
Rachel