That's very interesting. I've never actually tried to measure the capacity of a tank, I just believed the specs from the manufacturers. According to what you have posted the steel 72s are a little smaller than what I've read in the past and the aluminum 80 is bigger. You are causing me to question my faith in manufacturers specs.
If you take a look at the manufacturing process for pressure cylinders, you may be able to see why there is such a variation in tolerances. The metal is pressed and form into dies using very high forming pressures in order to yield the material into shape. They are not making Swiss watches.
In the case of steel 72, I measured 18 of them from two manufacturers, PST and Norris.
Steel 72 average volume: 70.5 cu ft
Max: 72.2 cu ft
Min: 69.6 cu ft
Standard deviation: 0.68
From the limited sampling size that I have, I could easily round the 70.5 cu ft and say that they average about 71 cu ft. That would be a reasonable round-up, that is just taking a rough average.
What I do find very puzzling, even annoying, is that they would say that a steel 72 has an actual volume of 71.2 cu ft. The use of 3 significant digits normally implies a higher precision than what is reasonable with these cylinders.
Manufacturing pressure vessels is not as precise as for example the machined parts that make a regulator first stage. The first stage parts have tight enough tolerances to fit together and be able to seal using tight O-ring tolerance.
My wife has two HP80 (made by PST), they both have a air volume capacity of about 85 cu ft. But, they were advertised as 80 cu ft.