Suit filed in case of "Girl dead, boy injured at Glacier National Park

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

So you want us to believe that in the context of what you said- and your history of PADI animus- you were “joking”….

Really? more like you posted something too smart by a half, and when it was pointed out you made an excuse ….
:kiss:
 
So you want us to believe that in the context of what you said- and your history of PADI animus- you were “joking”….

Really? more like you posted something too smart by a half, and when it was pointed out you made an excuse ….
Oh, I think we’re a lot alike. I too am a karaoke host, and a Libertarian. And just because I point out a lot of things I think PADI does wrong, I’m an upstanding member with a 20 year pin.

I don’t have a WIKI page though. Not famous (or infamous) enough.
 
And just because I point out a lot of things I think PADI does wrong, I’m an upstanding member with a 20 year pin.

That's the one thing that's frustrating about ScubaBoard. Any fact based criticism elicits accusations of agency bashing by self-appointed agency defenders.
 
Any fact based criticism elicits accusations of agency bashing by self-appointed agency defenders.

I do not and have not seen it that way.

"Fact" based criticism as you describe it is usually, if not almost always, opinion based.
 
I do not and have not seen it that way.

"Fact" based criticism as you describe it is usually, if not almost always, opinion based.
Without providing links to things I've said, you are providing an opinion, not facts. Feel free to illustrate how I state opinions not based on facts in PM. Please provide links so I can read my previous comments in the complete context.
 
Without providing links to things I've said, you are providing an opinion, not facts. Feel free to illustrate how I state opinions not based on facts in PM. Please provide links so I can read my previous comments in the complete context.

Indeed I am stating an opinion. However it was not pointed at you specifically, just to the agency bashers in general.

I, in turn request you provide links to "fact based" examples of criticism.
 
Indeed I am stating an opinion. However it was not pointed at you specifically, just to the agency bashers in general.

I, in turn request you provide links to "fact based" examples of criticism.
hit me up in PM and I'll do so.
 
Oh, I think we’re a lot alike. I too am a karaoke host, and a Libertarian. And just because I point out a lot of things I think PADI does wrong, I’m an upstanding member with a 20 year pin.

I don’t have a WIKI page though. Not famous (or infamous) enough.

That was an interesting read...nowhere near relevant but still...

raw.png
 
Oh c’mon. This is just getting interesting…
well, if Jim and anyone else who wants to participate in a multi-person thread all agree to publish the final results, I'd be happy to post a new thread. Just not here though.
 
https://www.shearwater.com/products/perdix-ai/

Back
Top Bottom